Adler wrote:
I have two suggestions for CC articles: I found the LEGO Castle History page to be a delightful tongue-in-cheek description of the product history which would go wonderfully hand-in-hand with your picture series.
Hi,
I recently wrote a somewhat silly castle history article in the "Castle LEGO Sets" forum called "LEGO Castle is Dead" which covers 1993 - 2004. If there was interest in a more detailed article of that nature with pictures, I could probably put something together. Unfortunately, many people took my article too seriously, so I don't know if it would be wise to write another article in that vein.
rogue27 wrote:I recently wrote a somewhat silly castle history article in the "Castle LEGO Sets" forum called "LEGO Castle is Dead" which covers 1993 - 2004. If there was interest in a more detailed article of that nature with pictures, I could probably put something together. Unfortunately, many people took my article too seriously, so I don't know if it would be wise to write another article in that vein.
It was taken seriously because it was written seriously. If you made it much plainer that it was a humourous work, I doubt if you'd have the same problem.
Formendacil wrote:It was taken seriously because it was written seriously. If you made it much plainer that it was a humourous work, I doubt if you'd have the same problem.
"Very funny, Rogue!"
- Formendacil, responding to my "LEGO Castle is Dead" post.
Formendacil wrote:It was taken seriously because it was written seriously. If you made it much plainer that it was a humourous work, I doubt if you'd have the same problem.
"Very funny, Rogue!"
- Formendacil, responding to my "LEGO Castle is Dead" post.
Can we please stop with the thread-jacking? This is getting a bit more common and it needs to stop. Not only is this rude, it also makes it difficult for honest people to conduct a discussion.
-Lenny
===
"The sound of laughter is like
the vaulted dome of
a temple of happiness. "
~-Milan Kundera-~
Formendacil wrote:It was taken seriously because it was written seriously. If you made it much plainer that it was a humourous work, I doubt if you'd have the same problem.
"Very funny, Rogue!"
- Formendacil, responding to my "LEGO Castle is Dead" post.
Can we please stop with the thread-jacking? This is getting a bit more common and it needs to stop. Not only is this rude, it also makes it difficult for honest people to conduct a discussion.
-Lenny
My first reply was a direct response to the thread. I should not have replied a second time, but the temptation was too great.
rogue27 wrote:
My first reply was a direct response to the thread. I should not have replied a second time, but the temptation was too great.
I understand. Perhaps rather than replying, you could send the guy a PM? That way you can figure out the situation without going off topic for a thread. Either that, or you can start a new thread, quoting the questionable comment and then add your rebuttle.
-lenny
===
"The sound of laughter is like
the vaulted dome of
a temple of happiness. "
~-Milan Kundera-~
