New Users have got to go!

by **TheOrk** » Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:08 am

kelderic wrote:I'm not entirely sure, but look at Gozna981. His website is "www.play-sex-game.com, and his profession in "Virtual sex"

Pssssst.

Your supposed to be more subtle about these things. :wink:

by **kelderic** » Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:12 pm

TheOrk wrote:Pssssst.

Your supposed to be more subtle about these things.

Sorry.

Kelderic

by **nazgul** » Sat Sep 02, 2006 3:20 am

Our newest member, James-Martin, seems to be another spammer, just look at his website.

Might be wrong,
but my only doubt is because of the names, instead of random letters and numbers.

-Nazgul

by **smcginnis** » Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:24 pm

I have a large list of links here in my maj gallery. I'm pretty sure that most of them are spammers, and some of them have been there for a couple of weeks now. I don't think that they've been mentioned before.

~smcginnis

by **nazgul** » Sun Sep 03, 2006 12:57 pm

Another of our newest members are spammers-
LisaRodrigue
-There website is to a canadian pharmacy.
Sounds pretty unbeleivable to me,

-nazgul

Edit: There's another one - B_Garcia.

by **nazgul** » Fri Sep 08, 2006 5:16 pm

There's another one- ashort. His website has something to do with restraunts.

-nazgul

by **nazgul** » Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:06 am

We seem to be getting quite a few spammers from something called "xanax". Might want to put it on the block list. Anyway, here's another spammer- Donna_Miller.

by **JPinoy** » Sat Sep 09, 2006 1:31 pm

Geez... LOL! It's like a Witch-Hunt now. :lol:

by **nazgul** » Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:36 pm

Sigh, the witch hunt continues. M-Clark is another spammer.

-nazgul

by **nazgul** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:57 am

Oh Joy

, another spammer - Linda-Baker. Thought you chould know.

-nazgul

by **architect** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:12 am

Nazgul,

The admins can also see the latest round of spammers. It is time consuming for Troy and Tony to hand edit them out. They will get to this task when they can.

You do not need to post every single new spammer in this thread. And if you do, please edit your last post. Replying to yourself in a thread is bad form. Thank you.

Ben

by **footsteps** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:06 pm

I didn't realize I was creating a "thread that will not die" when I started this. And I've been just as guilty as anyone, perhaps moreso, in going public with spammer issues. All 'good' things must come to an end.

As I'm the one who started this thread, is it kosher for me to ask that it be locked?

Alan

by **architect** » Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:14 pm

footsteps wrote:I didn't realize I was creating a "thread that will not die" when I started this. And I've been just as guilty as anyone, perhaps moreso, in going public with spammer issues. All 'good' things must come to an end.

As I'm the one who started this thread, is it kosher for me to ask that it be locked?

Alan

Yes, we can lock this thread now. If any CC member views a particularly offensive spammer (especially one starting threads in the forums) please send a pm to an admin so we can deal with them. Thank you.

Ben

New Users have got to go!

Who is online