I agree we need more femail figures (though as I'm in the midst conducting a Miss Legoland Pageant at eurobricks, I must say its surprising just how many female figures there are). The new princess is a step in the right direction.
Steve
Chrislad77 wrote:men's fantasy girls (princesses)
I've met plenty of little girls who wished that they were a princess. I wouldn't call that a mans fantasy.
Damien wrote:I don't think it's a matter of how many there were, but rather their role in society, and more importantly their presumed role in the mind of children. The few women who were truly capable leaders and warriors in the medieval era (such as Sichelgaita - Robert Guiscard's second wife) are not heavily publicized to a youth audience. Young boys equate Castles and Medieval with knights and warriors, even dragons, before equating them with strong female characters and the peasantry.
Mikael-o wrote:The soldiers and workers are left to their own devices for romantic inclinations. Which brings us to the coloured armour on the Jellybean knights in KKII.
Mikael-o wrote:(seriously though, I'd love more females too ... mostly princesses as it's easy to make different peasant women. I think however, that a sorceress would be a good companion for new crazy wizard. A dark queen, beautiful and terrible etc... to be both loved and feared ... you know)
symwyse wrote:Mikael-o wrote:The soldiers and workers are left to their own devices for romantic inclinations. Which brings us to the coloured armour on the Jellybean knights in KKII.
If I didn't have a sense of humor, I'd take offense to that.
It's fun to stay in the B-A-R-R-A-C-K-S... *not as catchy as I thought it would be*
symwyse wrote:Mikael-o wrote:(seriously though, I'd love more females too ... mostly princesses as it's easy to make different peasant women. I think however, that a sorceress would be a good companion for new crazy wizard. A dark queen, beautiful and terrible etc... to be both loved and feared ... you know)
I think the two would cancel each other out. Though it would be cool to see an updated Willa, albeit a better face. Someone attractive but with a smidgen of "come on, you know I'm evil" thrown in. If I wasn't such a purist when it comes to only selecting "yellow-skinned" minifigs, I'd buy the Poison Ivy minifig from BL just to have said sorceress/queen/what-have-you.
Mikael-o wrote:The soldiers and workers are left to their own devices for romantic inclinations. Which brings us to the coloured armour on the Jellybean knights in KKII.
Jacob C. wrote:If TLC produced some medieval civilian sets, then that would be an excellent reason to include more female figs.
Most of the castle sets are focused on the military/soldier aspect, so naturally, females are almost nowhere to be seen.
We need civilian sets!!
Emperor James wrote:the only problem i sea with women figs is that they would be one more fig that could be a soldier instead.
Emperor James wrote:
the only problem i sea with women figs is that they would be one more fig that could be a soldier instead. anyway i prefer my women real, without flat torsos.
(no bad joke)
LORD DOOM wrote:Emperor James wrote:
the only problem i sea with women figs is that they would be one more fig that could be a soldier instead. anyway i prefer my women real, without flat torsos.
(no bad joke)
Double, you, tea, F!? MATE!?
That's some pretty sexist smack you're talkin'. What's to prevent a woman from being a soldier?
Emp.Justinian wrote:
In the middle ages, except with very rare cases (aka joan of arc), it just didn't happen. All of society was against it, and besides, realistically women, in general, physically didn't/don't have as much of the muscle building hormones during puberty that would make them effective at medieval style fighting.
Also, My fellow emperor, the last part of your post seemed... unessesary.
God's speed Emp.Justinian
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest