Plastic Packaging
-
- Steward
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 3:55 am
- psu_ericksen
- Foot Soldier
- Posts: 207
- Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 3:30 pm
- Location: Toledo, Ohio
- Contact:
The last thing I want LEGO to do is raise prices because of some misguided marketing ploy. It would be smart to decrease packaging to save money and/or to keep from having to raise prices. But to use more expensive packaging and raise prices??? No thanks.
Sean
"All my life I've had one dream...to acheive my many goals." - HJS
Visit my Brickshelf gallery.
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=108432
Visit my Brickshelf gallery.
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=108432
- wunztwice
- Knight Bannerett
- Posts: 2656
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 5:33 pm
- Location: Eastern Oregon
- Contact:
I'd just say even with out switching over to more degradable packaging, it would help alot by just reducing the amount of bags, reducing cost AND being better for the environment. Plus it would be less annoying...
in His grip, Chris
Feed my hobby? [url=http://www.bricklink.com/store.asp?p=wunztwice]My Bricklink[/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/wunztwice]My Flickr![/url]
[url=http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/wunztwice/]My Brickshelf![/url](not updated...)
<><
Feed my hobby? [url=http://www.bricklink.com/store.asp?p=wunztwice]My Bricklink[/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/wunztwice]My Flickr![/url]
[url=http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/wunztwice/]My Brickshelf![/url](not updated...)
<><
Great idea, Chris, I was going to post that comment myself. Smaller boxes would be great too, although I do realise how atractive large boxes are percieved to be, they just don't do it for me personally
~Aaron~
[url=http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=DARKspawn]Brickshelf[/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/8401641@N03/]Flickr[/url]
[url=http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=DARKspawn]Brickshelf[/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/8401641@N03/]Flickr[/url]