Do you think that Lego should continue making KK2?

Open message to The LEGO Company. We make no guarantee that anyone from LEGO will actually read them, let alone respond!

Do you think Lego should continue making KK2?

Yes
37
45%
No
46
55%
 
Total votes: 83

User avatar
DARKspawn
Lord
Posts: 1631
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:29 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by DARKspawn »

Athos wrote:I can't believe how many people voted yes...

Steve
probably for fear of having no castle them at all ... I know I was tempted ;)
User avatar
Sir Kohran
Sheriff
Posts: 1568
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:24 am

Post by Sir Kohran »

DARKspawn wrote:
Athos wrote:I can't believe how many people voted yes...

Steve
probably for fear of having no castle them at all ... I know I was tempted ;)
Or maybe because it was just a decent line that some people liked?

- Matt
User avatar
Maedhros
Knight Templar
Knight Templar
Posts: 1885
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: The dark forests of Sweden
Contact:

Post by Maedhros »

Sir Kohran wrote:
DARKspawn wrote:
Athos wrote:I can't believe how many people voted yes...

Steve
probably for fear of having no castle them at all ... I know I was tempted ;)
Or maybe because it was just a decent line that some people liked?

- Matt
Or maybe we shouldn´t start debating this..... AGAIN ;)
"Hinc satis elucet maiorem habere uim ad discenda ista liberam curiositatem quam meticulosam necessitatem.”
- Augustinus Hipponensis
User avatar
Assamite
Serf
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 4:09 am

Post by Assamite »

I don't see why the jelly bean knights can't show up for cameos in the new line, maybe with a slightly improved look. Lions & Falcons were showing up years after their core runs ended.

CM
User avatar
Spongey
Merchant
Posts: 1377
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 4:39 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Spongey »

Hoping that this doesn't spark a holy war, like the one present when we reviewed Vladek's Dark Fortress, I would have to vote no. I would be willing to go without castle for a couple of years if it gave LEGO time to come up with something good. Anyways, there is a new castle line coming along in 2007, so I have no reservations when condemning KKII.
User avatar
Sir Kohran
Sheriff
Posts: 1568
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:24 am

Post by Sir Kohran »

Maedhros wrote:
Sir Kohran wrote:
DARKspawn wrote: probably for fear of having no castle them at all ... I know I was tempted ;)
Or maybe because it was just a decent line that some people liked?

- Matt
Or maybe we shouldn´t start debating this..... AGAIN ;)
Well, seeing as KK2 has had its time, and is now taking a break, I guess it is a pointless argument. :?

- Matt
User avatar
Maedhros
Knight Templar
Knight Templar
Posts: 1885
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:22 pm
Location: The dark forests of Sweden
Contact:

Post by Maedhros »

Sir Kohran wrote: Well, seeing as KK2 has had its time, and is now taking a break, I guess it is a pointless argument. :?
Taking a break..? I´d be very surprised if it ever showed up again, I mean that has never happened to any other faction..
"Hinc satis elucet maiorem habere uim ad discenda ista liberam curiositatem quam meticulosam necessitatem.”
- Augustinus Hipponensis
User avatar
JPinoy
Knight Bannerett
Posts: 2476
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 7:04 pm
Location: Rockefeller Center LEGO Store
Contact:

Post by JPinoy »

Is it possible to have KK2, Castle 2007, and Vikings run simultaneously???

Thats like having 3 Castle Themes run at the same time... Basically, Castle PWNZ the other themes in continuity, variety, and etc. :P
Peoples_General, master of the vast LEGO armies!
[url]http://www.bricklink.com/aboutMe.asp?u=Peoples_General[/url]
Behold! The mighty armies of my ORIGIN theme!
[url]http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.c ... lesGeneral[/url]
User avatar
architect
Baron von Ellermann
Posts: 3708
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 5:10 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by architect »

This thread is now irrelevant. I am locking it. Have a nice day :wink:

Ben
CC Sets Admin
Locked