Here's an interesting article on the movie which I came across on the internet.....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/01/18/wcrus18.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/01/18/ixworld.html
This movie is sure to spark some debates.
I agree with the reviews when they say it has a lack of a storyline
I read online that they will release an "Extended Edition" DVD version sometime in the future which will contain all the original footage Ridley Scott wanted in the movie. Apparently Scott had to cut about an hour & 20 min out of the movie to keep it down to about 2 and a half hours.
The extra footage will probably add a lot more to the storyline. Maybe some more action scenes too?
Either that or the writers have problems.
[/code]
Well, personally I loved the movie. I do enjoy going for the battle scenes and other such elements, however, I would personally never say that it has no storyline. The movie was about the Crusades and the waring people who fought for the freedom they found in their religion. In my opinion, most of the people who write reviews need to find another line of work.
Well, the story may have been a bit choppy... The battles did often end a bit abruptly. Although, on the other hand, the movie was about a portion of the CRUSADES. I would not consider the Crusades a perfectly consistent, smooth flowing, simple time period to base a movie off of (just some thoughts).
P.S. hope i got those darn quote things to work right.
JPinoy wrote:I think they'll probably put the battle where the Templars and Hospitalers *tried* to attack the Saracens... but got wiped out.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest