by Sibley » Fri Jul 13, 2007 11:32 pm
Majisto's role was always really ambiguous. Sometimes he controlled the dragon and the Dragon Masters were trying to stop him. Other times the Dragon Masters were his army in addition to the dragon. The similarity between the shield designs of the Black Knights and Dragon Masters made me think they're allied or related, so Majisto's relationship with the Black Knights depends on his relationship with the Dragon Masters.
Either way, control of a dragon generally puts one square into the "villain" category unless one uses said dragon to oppose some other, more obviously evil force. Because no such force existed concurrently with Majisto, I'd say he's a villain. (The Wolfpack and Dark Forestmen are petty thieves; neither the Black Knights nor the Royal Knights have the arcane power necessary to be more obviously evil than a dracomancer. The Fright Knights are the first faction that could make Majisto good, though they never coexisted and thus could be allied for all we know. Vladek and the Necromancer likewise make Majisto look like Santa Claus.)
All that just to argue that Majisto is, in fact, a villain; a point which is ultimately irrelevant to the discussion at hand, namely: which villain is more powerful? In fact, the entire argument could have been avoided merely by asking which wizard, or which magic-user, is more powerful, rather than which villain. But debates have a life of their own, and each in turn seeks its own resolution.
Now, onto the question that we have taken upon ourselves: Which magic-user is more powerful? Our first task should be to determine what it means for one to be more powerful. The obvious choice is to say that the more powerful one should be able to do at least one thing the other can't, or do more easily at least one thing the other can, without being unable to do anything the weaker can with the same amount of ease. However, it is easy to see that this metric would not necessarily imply that either is more powerful; the lion cannot match the house-rat's ability to hide in the walls, but only a fool would say that the lion is not more powerful.
It is also tempting to compare the two by their accomplishments; one might argue that the villain who conquered more lands, swayed more hearts and minds, and held his throne the longest was the more powerful. Unfortunately, this attractive approach largely ignores historical context; although both wizards fought against highly-organized royal armies, differences in local population, religion, underground resistance movements (Majisto's exact relationship with the Wolfpack is unknown), and even royal family makeup (notably the Necromancer's kidnapping of the Crown Princess) all affect the respective successes or failures of the wizards in question.
To truly judge in the abstract the relative powers of these two magic-users is nearly impossible, and highly subjective. It is impossible to force either into the other's historical situation, and though it may be interesting to wonder how the Necromancer might handle the cloak-and-dagger politics of the Wolfpack and the Dark Forest, it is largely a futile exercise. Thus I shall abstain from voting.