albero78 wrote:What can they offer more to convince in paying?
How about keeping Brickshelf up and running?
Does that mean anything? Where are all the people promising financial support if it would keep Brickshelf running?
albero78 wrote:What can they offer more to convince in paying?
Athos wrote:Then what would our $60/year have gotten us?

Mr. D wrote:That's a good point. Many were so upset that Brickshelf was going down - now lets just be thankful that it's not! After all, while some can't afford $60/year, many can. In fact, for anyone working eight-hour days at only $9.00/hour, $60/year isn't even a full day's work!
D-Man
Kozai13 wrote:Does this mean we have to pay to be a brickshelf user now?
But for those of us who are already saving for college, a home of their own, girlfriends, etc. £30 (or more, depending how long I use the site) seems a bit disconcerting.

Bluesecrets wrote:But for those of us who are already saving for college, a home of their own, girlfriends, etc. £30 (or more, depending how long I use the site) seems a bit disconcerting.
We are all saving for one thing or the other. If you want my list that includes more schooling, LEGO expensive sets, a visit to see my best friend, a laptop, new shelves for my collection, and the list goes on and on. But my point was money is personal. Whether you choose to spend it on an image hosting site or saving it for any of the things you want, is your choice. Kevin has the right to charge whatever he sees fit for his site. If you don't want to pay it, then don't.
But being grateful for Brickshelf being still in existed is important. People don't like doing nice things for people who whine, complain and find fault with you and your choices.
kelderic wrote:Also, don't think of it as 60 a year. Think of it as 60 for 13 years.
Sir Kohran wrote:Of course I want to pay for it. I would gladly return some of the goodness Kevin has done for us. What I'm troubled about is the payment type - I'd rather just pay a single big sum than continuous payments.
Mr. D wrote:Sir Kohran wrote:Of course I want to pay for it. I would gladly return some of the goodness Kevin has done for us. What I'm troubled about is the payment type - I'd rather just pay a single big sum than continuous payments.
I actually think that small monthly amounts is better than one large sum. Whether you pay $5 a month or $60 a year, it's still the same amount. Also, if you pay a yearly sum, than you have to use the service for the entire year. With monthly amounts, you can decide that it is just to expensive after a few months and only have lost $10 or $20 instead of $60.
D-Man

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest