Classic-Castle.com


The source for all your LEGO Castle needs!

Blocking Troll content?

Rules, Regulations, Announcements, Technical Issues, Etc.

Blocking Troll content?

Postby Sir Nelson » Sat Jan 19, 2008 2:36 am

Dear CC Admins,

Is there any way to allow CC members to block the forum content of certain other CC members using a setting that applies only to your own account? I am sick of reading the "know-it-all" trolling posts from a certain "know-it-all" who refuses to use proper grammar and spelling, and I would like know if it would be possible for me to be able to skip over those posts at all costs.

Thank you.
Last edited by Sir Nelson on Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Sir Nelson
Old Wizard
 
Posts: 844
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Former Lord's manor, now in the cave of an Old Wizard

Postby Scnicker » Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:25 am

Haha. Good call Nelson. That kind of an "ignore" feature would be really appreciated.
User avatar
Scnicker
Landlord
 
Posts: 978
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Istanbul - Turkey

Postby RichardAM » Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:22 am

They have that feature on some other boards that I visit.

I have no clue over the coding and implementation of it, but it is possible, even with phpbb.

http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=228489
http://www.phpbb.com/community/viewtopic.php?t=24052

Back to the suggestion itself, it would be something that I too would like to see.
artificial snow

-richard-am.net /lego-
Image Image
User avatar
RichardAM
Merchant
 
Posts: 1258
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 4:23 pm

Postby doc069 » Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:46 am

Censorship?

I would have to disagree with having this option of a knee-jerk censorship button (even if it is only for my own viewing). I feel that one's (open) mind makes better judgment calls on what not/to read.

Pearls of wisdom can be found in words that are less than eloquent.

Regards,

Lee
"Rules are for the obedience of fools. And the guidance of wise men (& women)." Sir David Ogilvy (1911-1999)
User avatar
doc069
Bailiff
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:30 am
Location: Canada

Postby Sir Kohran » Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:21 pm

I have to say I don't really like this idea as having certain people 'switched off' because they've said something that annoyed you makes for a rather cold community. If you've got a problem with another member then sort it out with them personally.

- Matt
User avatar
Sir Kohran
Sheriff
 
Posts: 1567
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:24 am

Postby footsteps » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:29 pm

Censorship?

A topic similar to this came up on another board on which I post. My take here is the same as there.

"Censorship" would be a button that I could press that would block everyone from reading HWSNBN's post.

"Discernment" would be a button that I could press that would free me from seeing HWSNBN's posts, while allowing others to see, read, and respond if they so pleased.

Having said that, I don't believe such a feature is needed on this board, as that feature already exists.

If anyone is interested in knowing more about how this feature operates, feel free to PM me.

My two cents.

Alan
I'm a human BEING, not a human doing!
The two most important days of your life are the day you are born
and the day you discover why. (Donald Sensing)
One plus one equals three... for large values of one. (Bruce Fournier)
User avatar
footsteps
Tastes good with ketchup
 
Posts: 1680
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 12:03 am
Location: Canada

Postby Sir Nelson » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:46 pm

It appears that some have misread my initial post, so I have edited it. I was not calling for censorship in any way, but rather for 'selective browsing' options that would be applicable only to one's own account, and not anyone else's.
Image
User avatar
Sir Nelson
Old Wizard
 
Posts: 844
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 10:15 pm
Location: Former Lord's manor, now in the cave of an Old Wizard

Postby Bruce N H » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:49 pm

Hey Nelson,

If I have to read them, you can too. ;)

More seriously, I'm not sure of the ins and outs of the phpBB system, as that is not my area of the site, but in a threaded forum, wouldn't that make threads kind of confusing? Easier to skim and ignore, IMO.

Bruce
User avatar
Bruce N H
Precentor of the Scriptorium
Precentor of the Scriptorium
 
Posts: 6690
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:11 pm
Location: Middle Zealand

Postby Blueandwhite » Sat Jan 19, 2008 9:36 pm

Personally I hope that something like this doesn't come into fruition. We are a small community, and I suspect that something like this could cause CC to become very splintered.

I know that some threads can become very heated, arousing anger in even the most level headed posters. Heck, I'm almost certain that I have been at the centre of that fire on more than one occasion. I've probably said a number of things that have aggrivated others on the forum, and for that I'm genuinely sorry. Having said that, I'm still a bit apprehensive about a system that allows posters to sensor each other. I sincerely believe that as adults we are more than able to rise to the occasion and move past some of these issues.

I'd just like to add that I believe that the staff here at CC do an excellent job ensuring that posts are for the most part on-topic and respectful of the feelings of other members. Even when things do get out of hand, we have a great bunch of mods who keep things running smoothly.
Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch Batman!!

My Brickshelf Gallery
My Flickr
User avatar
Blueandwhite
CC Mascot Maker
 
Posts: 1417
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:12 pm
Location: Bolton, Ontario

Postby rogue27 » Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:30 am

I play video games and often post on the forums at www.gamefaqs.com. That site does have an ignore feature. I was reluctant to use it for the reasons stated above, but I eventually realized that some people honestly have nothing worthwhile to contribute. Ever.

GameFaqs became much more enjoyable when I turned on the ignore feature. However, this community is MUCH smaller than GameFaqs and even the most unpopular CC members have nothing on some of the GameFaqs users. Trust me, we're lucky with the community we have. I don't think anything needs to change.
User avatar
rogue27
Knight Templar
Knight Templar
 
Posts: 1375
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 2:14 am
Location: The Icy North

Postby Prince Imdol » Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:55 am

I have not yet seen this problem, "in my inbox", but I am sure you guys have valid reasons to bring up this topic. I say go on ahead.


P.I
Thomas C.
"Sow a thought, reap an action;
Sow an action, reap a habit.
Sow a habit, reap a character.
Sow a character, reap a destiny"

"Don't let school interfere with your education."-Huckleberry Finn
User avatar
Prince Imdol
Master
 
Posts: 1762
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:11 am
Location: Massachusetts

Postby Aliencat » Sun Jan 20, 2008 10:42 am

Well it would make topics make less sense if you read them over, I guess it would be easier to just skip the post entirely when you see "username" (I think we all know who we're talking about) posted it. I think the option would create more distance between members though.
In this case, maybe a temporary ban would be better? PM an admin if you have a problem with someone.
Between plotting to kill you all and chasing balls of yarn, I also build MOCs

Image
User avatar
Aliencat
Josh's Minion
 
Posts: 2171
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:21 pm
Location: Malé, Maldives

Postby Athos » Sun Jan 20, 2008 4:22 pm

I haven't noticed it too much (which is a testament to the quality of the board). Not enough to warrant any kind of major forum overhaul. Though I tend to just skim the posts, unless its a topic I'm really interested in.

Besides, an ignore function wouldn't really help to correct the poster's behavior. It would pretty much allow him to continue making crappy posts unhindered.

A better way may be gentle correcting by respected older members or staff. Though this could be labor intensive and easily get out of hand...

Steve
User avatar
Athos
Councilor of the Realm
 
Posts: 4140
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 4:33 am
Location: Nevada

Postby Jibbajaba » Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:50 am

The member in question annoys us all (or at least most of us), but he is selling off his collection so I would imagine that he will drift away in short order. With a community this small, I also agree that an ignore feature would not be a good idea.

Chris
User avatar
Jibbajaba
Laborer
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 12:45 am

Postby Scnicker » Tue Jan 22, 2008 9:08 am

I don't think people will start ignoring each other the moment we have such an option. Many people get along really really well here despite their many differences, but I think we should be given the freedom to ignore the people that makes us uncomfortable and lower our desire to contribute to Classic-Castle. ;)
User avatar
Scnicker
Landlord
 
Posts: 978
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Istanbul - Turkey

Next

Return to Administrative

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests