by koffiemoc » Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:00 pm
Yes, I meant to tell that today's king is a successor of the youngest brother. It might even be so that he isn't a great-great-grandchild in direct or even indirect line. But since that old time there's a king who is named king, but with no land or property and therefor only a small base of power. And yes, you two have guessed correctly that it's the short-text-limit that prohibited me to tell any more.
But I think that's something good. Not only because no-one wants to read longwinding stories on a screen, but it leaves more room for the reader to fill the blanks. As this is meant as a back story for a collaborative game/moc project, it should allow many participants to adapt and make this their own lore as they like.
Every six weeks I write a column for the collegues at work, it's published on the intranet. Always fun to see what people read in it that I didn't write - or at least that I didn't put in the article conciously. To some this might seem frightening, seeing readers run off with your child. I think it's amusing, amazing and I learn from it.
pretiumque et causa laboris
pixit