Weekly Set Review: Hemlock Stronghold
- Horak the Great
- Peasant
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 4:10 am
- Location: NY, USA
I loved the forestmen sets.
Alas, I strongly disliked this dark forest set. It was my first foray into anything lego castle in a very long time (6077 Forestmen's River Fortress was before this) Lego city and space sets filled the intervening years.
I used this set for parts. I really liked the well/sink thing. It never hurts to have more arches...lessens the struggle between castle expansion or scenery...
And the rooftop catapult...well some things are best left unsaid, especially when stated so well by others...
Alas, I strongly disliked this dark forest set. It was my first foray into anything lego castle in a very long time (6077 Forestmen's River Fortress was before this) Lego city and space sets filled the intervening years.
I used this set for parts. I really liked the well/sink thing. It never hurts to have more arches...lessens the struggle between castle expansion or scenery...
And the rooftop catapult...well some things are best left unsaid, especially when stated so well by others...
-
- Archer
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 4:31 am
- Location: San Diego, CA
Let's let sleeping threads lie.
[url=http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=DanielHall]BrickShelf[/url]
[url=http://www.squidoo.com/lensmasters/dantownehall]My Squidoo page![/url]
[url=http://www.squidoo.com/lensmasters/dantownehall]My Squidoo page![/url]
- JoshWedin
- Chevalier de Chèvre
- Posts: 4995
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 2:35 pm
- Location: Pondering what you are pondering
- Contact:
It is okay to revive set reviews. After all, that is why they are here. It is the old, irrelevant threads that we discourage new members from reviving.Traveler wrote:Let's let sleeping threads lie.
Josh
AFOL and his money are easily parted.
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/ak_brickster/8 ... hotostream][img]http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8252/85336074 ... 2a10_t.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.Brothers-Brick.com]The Brothers Brick[/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/ak_brickster/8 ... hotostream][img]http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8252/85336074 ... 2a10_t.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.Brothers-Brick.com]The Brothers Brick[/url]
- Lord Felix
- Landlord
- Posts: 912
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2006 2:07 am
- Location: Utah, USA Age: 27
I agree. Please stop diggin' up the oldies! I keep on thinking that this is the NEW set review for this week, and then...Let's let sleeping threads lie.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
[url=http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=Dandin]Brickshelf[/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/8499398@N07/]Flickr[/url]
[url=http://www.myspace.com/candlemusic]My Band: Candle[/url]
[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/8499398@N07/]Flickr[/url]
[url=http://www.myspace.com/candlemusic]My Band: Candle[/url]
I disagree with this, and agree with Josh. I believe that newer members should have the right to express their opinion on sets who were a weekly set review before they joined. However, I also agree that members shouldn't be posting about irrelevant topic; set reviews are still okay.Quote:
Let's let sleeping threads lie.
I agree. Please stop diggin' up the oldies! I keep on thinking that this is the NEW set review for this week, and then... it isn't.
Personally, I never got to review this set, so to avoid double posting, I'll do it now. I like the Dark Forest sets, however meagre their numbers, and believe that this one is good both as a single set, and as a builder for a forest complex.
[img]http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/danielz/m ... uce1.2.jpg[/img]
- architect
- Baron von Ellermann
- Posts: 3708
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 5:10 pm
- Location: Saint Louis, MO USA
- Contact:
Set reviews are different than other old threads. I encourage anyone who has not commented on a reviewed set to do so. This is why each set archive page has a link back to the set review. So if you want to review Dark Dragon's Den, go to the page here: http://www.classic-castle.com/sets/archives/6076.html
Recently newbies have been digging up old irrelevant threads (ie: What new KK2 sets are coming out in 2005). That is not acceptable. Commenting on a set review is. In addition, mods and admins can correct poor forum behavior, not general members. That is in the Terms of Service.
Ben
CC Sets Admin
Recently newbies have been digging up old irrelevant threads (ie: What new KK2 sets are coming out in 2005). That is not acceptable. Commenting on a set review is. In addition, mods and admins can correct poor forum behavior, not general members. That is in the Terms of Service.
Ben
CC Sets Admin
Ok, sounds good to me. I just wasn't aware of this policy.architect wrote:Set reviews are different than other old threads. I encourage anyone who has not commented on a reviewed set to do so.
EDIT: And sorry for taking this thread off topic!
[url=http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=DanielHall]BrickShelf[/url]
[url=http://www.squidoo.com/lensmasters/dantownehall]My Squidoo page![/url]
[url=http://www.squidoo.com/lensmasters/dantownehall]My Squidoo page![/url]
- Legendary_Corsair
- Archer
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:27 pm
- Location: The Forbidden City of Komilthria
- Contact:
- Chrislad77
- Foot Soldier
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 1:34 am
- Location: Virginia, USA
- Knight David
- Gong Farmer
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:58 pm
- Location: Ireland
Very nice set, i like the way it comes with a lot of mini figs.
David
David
Visit my Gallery at:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=DtK-300
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?m=DtK-300