Classic-Castle Farm Standard

Discussion of personal LEGO Castle creations
User avatar
architect
Baron von Ellermann
Posts: 3708
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 5:10 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Classic-Castle Farm Standard

Post by architect »

This standard is meant to provide an easy way for various people to work together to build a large medieval farmland display. Since this concept is specifically designed for displaying purposes, many elements (such as the need for a coordinator) are included. Please do not let this limit creativity. Producing a large countryside can be daunting task. This standard will allow fans with small, moderate, or large collections to participate.

Check out the standard here:

http://www.classic-castle.com/ccc/farmstandard.html

Please post your suggestions to improve the standard in this thread. Thanks!

Image
Last edited by architect on Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
JoshWedin
Chevalier de Chèvre
Posts: 4995
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 2:35 pm
Location: Pondering what you are pondering
Contact:

Post by JoshWedin »

Hey Ben,

Impressive job on the farm standard, it is deceptively simple. :) After reading the 'rules', my first thought was, "This can't work, its not complex enough". But I can't find any loopholes that would mess it up. Excellent job!

Josh
AFOL and his money are easily parted.

[url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/ak_brickster/8 ... hotostream][img]http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8252/85336074 ... 2a10_t.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.Brothers-Brick.com]The Brothers Brick[/url]
User avatar
architect
Baron von Ellermann
Posts: 3708
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 5:10 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by architect »

JoshWedin wrote:Hey Ben,

Impressive job on the farm standard, it is deceptively simple. :) After reading the 'rules', my first thought was, "This can't work, its not complex enough". But I can't find any loopholes that would mess it up. Excellent job!

Josh
Thanks Josh! The only hard parts I can think of right now is putting curved roads/paths through or near the farms. We will test this out at BrickFest and see how well it works.

Connecting the farms could be done with corner field marker stones such as grey round 2x2 plates.

Ben
User avatar
footsteps
Tastes good with ketchup
Posts: 1680
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 12:03 am
Location: Canada

Post by footsteps »

architect wrote:Thanks Josh! The only hard parts I can think of right now is putting curved roads/paths through or near the farms. We will test this out at BrickFest and see how well it works.

Connecting the farms could be done with corner field marker stones such as grey round 2x2 plates.

Ben
No matter how "foolproof" you make something, some fool will come along and mess it up!

With that, let me just jump right in... :wink: :wink:

For roads/paths, keep using the "multiple of 8" principle. Roads are 8-wide on plates or baseplates that are some multiple of 8. When a road reaches an edge, there must be some multiple of 8 studs (or zero studs if the edge is only 8 wide) on either side of the road.

Thus, an 8x16 plate could have a road the goes straight along the length, or cuts across the width with an 8x8 field portion next to it.

On 16x16 or larger baseplates, the road can wander wherever it likes withing the baseplate, as long as its entrance/exit on an edge leaves multiples of 8 (or zero) on either side.

A bend in the road can be made on as small as an 8x8 plate.

++++++++++++

Overall, I think the "standard" of multiples of eight is inspired. Having 8x8 or 8x16 patches of field means that there is little or no chance of blank spots. A small rocky hillock can quickly be made to fill any gaps in a display. Hmmm, I'm already getting some ideas for small non-tilled segments of field.

But first, we have to move.

Alan
I'm a human BEING, not a human doing!
The two most important days of your life are the day you are born
and the day you discover why. (Donald Sensing)
One plus one equals three... for large values of one. (Bruce Fournier)
User avatar
Athos
Councilor of the Realm
Posts: 4262
Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2004 4:33 am
Location: Nevada
Contact:

Post by Athos »

A bunch of the round trees would make a nice orchard field too. I've been meaning to do a MOC with an orchard for quite a while.

Here is some corn (though I know corn is not really medieval, as it was an American crop): You could probably modify it into wheat.

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Athos ... /gs018.jpg

The vines on the side could make nice vineyards, especially if you had some purple round 1x1s (does such a thing exist?) or some light green ones:

http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Athos ... /gs023.jpg

Steve
[url=http://www.johnny-thunder.blogspot.com/]Travel with Johnny Thunder![/url]
User avatar
kelderic
Knight Bannerett
Posts: 2583
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 8:45 pm
Location: Indiana, USA
Contact:

Post by kelderic »

This is good. This whole idea of standards was inspired, and this one lives up to it's name. It doesn't require many b bricks, so people with smaller collections can participate, and it still looks good, and will help to bring the display alive.

Kelderic
Battling with college to try and prevent the dark age.
User avatar
architect
Baron von Ellermann
Posts: 3708
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 5:10 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by architect »

footsteps wrote: For roads/paths, keep using the "multiple of 8" principle. Roads are 8-wide on plates or baseplates that are some multiple of 8. When a road reaches an edge, there must be some multiple of 8 studs (or zero studs if the edge is only 8 wide) on either side of the road.

Thus, an 8x16 plate could have a road the goes straight along the length, or cuts across the width with an 8x8 field portion next to it.

On 16x16 or larger baseplates, the road can wander wherever it likes withing the baseplate, as long as its entrance/exit on an edge leaves multiples of 8 (or zero) on either side.

A bend in the road can be made on as small as an 8x8 plate.
Your road ideas are good. As long as it is in a mutiple of eight at the edge, arranging a road should be possible.

Overall, I think the "standard" of multiples of eight is inspired. Having 8x8 or 8x16 patches of field means that there is little or no chance of blank spots. A small rocky hillock can quickly be made to fill any gaps in a display. Hmmm, I'm already getting some ideas for small non-tilled segments of field.
Rock outcroppings are a cool idea. Those could easily be made with big ugly rock peices on a 8x8 plate. Any 8x8 plate could be a farm related vignette like Nelson's scarecrow.

Ben
User avatar
Traveler
Reeve
Posts: 491
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 5:42 pm

Post by Traveler »

This is a great idea. It should really help move castle displays in an even more realistic direction, as an actual town would be surrounded by supporting fields of crops. My question is, will the farm display be integrated into a town using the CCC standard? If so, it would neeed to be carefully planned to match up with the size of the outer wall of the city.

Good thinking!
User avatar
WilliamH
Villein
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 1:00 pm
Location: South Coast, England

Post by WilliamH »

architect wrote:
footsteps wrote: For roads/paths, keep using the "multiple of 8" principle. Roads are 8-wide on plates or baseplates that are some multiple of 8. When a road reaches an edge, there must be some multiple of 8 studs (or zero studs if the edge is only 8 wide) on either side of the road.

Thus, an 8x16 plate could have a road the goes straight along the length, or cuts across the width with an 8x8 field portion next to it.

On 16x16 or larger baseplates, the road can wander wherever it likes withing the baseplate, as long as its entrance/exit on an edge leaves multiples of 8 (or zero) on either side.

A bend in the road can be made on as small as an 8x8 plate.
Your road ideas are good. As long as it is in a mutiple of eight at the edge, arranging a road should be possible.
Or make paths 4 wide down an edge of a baseplate. Roads are then two abutting paths
User avatar
The Blue Knight
Merchant
Posts: 1362
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:28 am
Location: Yamhill Country
Contact:

Post by The Blue Knight »

This is a great idea. It gives more structure to the display, it could become part of our moonbase equivalent. Please post some pix of the fields when you return from BF!
Men who lie, merely hide the truth; but men who tell half-lies, have forgotten where they put it--Samuel Clemens
User avatar
Remyth
Trade King
Posts: 1855
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 3:43 am
Location: At the corner of Nowhere Avenue and Not Close to Anything Street
Contact:

Post by Remyth »

Great idea Ben!

I think that it is cool that you are trying to get people with little collections (like me :oops: ) into the larger MOC world.
Thomas Wunz <><

"A nameless, shapeless beast from the dark underside of Chat." - Josh Wedin

[url=http://flickr.com/photos/11381994@N00/]Flickr[/url]
User avatar
Peppermint Pig
candied swine
Posts: 630
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:42 pm

Post by Peppermint Pig »

Factors of 8 are sensible, however when you work big, uniformity of the layout can be compromised by any number of factors, such as whether the table for the display is level and can support the weight, and subtle variances in area for larger pieces.

Stone Goblin and I use baseplates, but we elevate the overall height by a brick and then apply plates. We do this so that we can put 2x1 technic bricks on corners, 2 studs away from the edge so we can keep things locked together. If you plan for it, you can add sink holes and ponds, and you can always build higher.

If there is at all any downside, it's that special baseplates don't line up as conveniently. For Space fans, you might as well just stick with the baseplate as your lowest level, and creating piles of plate to create the altitude you want.

The important thing is to make sure SOME of your roads meet a standard: You'll want some roads to be unique, and definitely organic looking with grass patches that rise a bit over the path height, and winding in and out a bit. If you get to a crossroads, you can have a piece like this, so if someone creates a wholly tan dirt path, it will be perfectly matched.

Code: Select all

|\     /|
| \   / |
|  | |  |
|  | |  |
A 2 stud from the border dirt path can work, or a thirds approach with grass, dirt path, grass, but I think it will be best to keep small paths centered in the area. I see no problem with doing large dirt paths that are half dirt, half grass, so to connect next to similar pieces to create wider roads. As a pixel artist, I've had to deal with tile challenges before. You don't want to restrict things too much, but you want an efficient design, therefore it's good to rely on communcation between others for the layout.

If the styles of your scenes do not match, then getting a system for pairing pieces together will be the least of your worries. :)
User avatar
architect
Baron von Ellermann
Posts: 3708
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 5:10 pm
Location: Saint Louis, MO USA
Contact:

Post by architect »

Traveler wrote:This is a great idea. It should really help move castle displays in an even more realistic direction, as an actual town would be surrounded by supporting fields of crops. My question is, will the farm display be integrated into a town using the CCC standard? If so, it would neeed to be carefully planned to match up with the size of the outer wall of the city.

Good thinking!
Yes, we should be able to use both standards. As long as there are a large quantity of 8x8 and 8x16 bases, surrounding a city wall should not be a problem.
Or make paths 4 wide down an edge of a baseplate. Roads are then two abutting paths
That is a good idea too. Roads could be 8 wide and paths 4 wide.
I think that it is cool that you are trying to get people with little collections (like me) into the larger MOC world.
A good standard should allow people with different size collections to participate ;)
Stone Goblin and I use baseplates, but we elevate the overall height by a brick and then apply plates. We do this so that we can put 2x1 technic bricks on corners, 2 studs away from the edge so we can keep things locked together. If you plan for it, you can add sink holes and ponds, and you can always build higher.
This could work but it sounds very brick intensive. Of course portions of any display could also use this method as long as there were transitional contours sloping down at the edges. I also like the option of adding more changes in elevation to the standard.

Ben
User avatar
Peppermint Pig
candied swine
Posts: 630
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:42 pm

Post by Peppermint Pig »

You're correct, it is more brick intensive. But on the plus side, having a raised surface also means you will not be seeing the space that is visible when bricking together two baseplates, as well as the issue of baseplate vs plate height differences. If you use technic pins/stud joints, then it doesn't really matter as much whether you use plates or baseplates underneath just as long as there's some type of support structure to keep the pins locked without much stress. Supports could instead be done with spaced brick pillars on smaller plates and/or a 'boxed in black wall for the edge of the piece. I like duplo for this task.

If many people are to contribute to a farm scene, I think it would be better to go ahead with more piece usage (might as well go for quality??). If technic pins are used, there would be more opportunities for raised design exploration, such as plateauing to allow groups of mocs to sit at different heights, and insert hillsides or cliffs between them.
User avatar
Mike Viper
Archer
Posts: 377
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:38 am
Location: At home practicing my singing, building, or hanging around with friends.

Post by Mike Viper »

Don't forget on making berry bushes. All you need is a bunch of 1x1 square flat green pieces, 1x2 flat green pieces and some 1x1 flat round red pieces.

Build up a bush, which isn't that complicated, leaving gaps like real bushes, this would be done with the help of the 1x1 squares, and stick in some of the red pieces as berries.

Hope I helped.
I ow it to wunztwice for directing me here.
Post Reply