
Alan
I think you mean wotTwoTonic Knight wrote:Just whot we need
Whot makes you be a-thinkin' thot? 'Nuther (Canadians and Brits don't read the next word) bloody toff.jamitjames wrote:I think you mean wotTwoTonic Knight wrote:Just whot we need![]()
"Wot" is an actual archaic word that might lead to confusion in our archaic setting - I was using "whot" as a pronunciation variation of "what" to be clearer on what I was saying. So, to actually answer your question, no, I did not mean "wot". I could have used "wut", but that seems more American somehow (Wut you doin' thar, Slick?).jamitjames wrote:Redwall makes me think that
What is it between 600-649?jamitjames wrote:0-9: Gong farmer
10-24: Serf
25-49: Villein
50-74: Peasant
75-99: Freeman
100-149: Laborer
150-199: Apprentice
200-249: Foot soldier
250-299: Artisan
300-349: Bailiff
350-399:Archer
400-449:Journeyman
450-499:Reeve
500-599:Steward
650-699:Squire
700-?:Gentleman
800-?Man-At-Arms
Sir Terrance wrote:
What is it between 600-649?