Page 1 of 3
New Users have got to go!
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 9:49 pm
by footsteps
Two in a row: #966 & #967
Launch the MIRV's
Nuke 'em til they glow,
Then shoot 'em in the dark!
Alan
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 10:51 pm
by E of Alshire
SavaTheAggie wrote:I swear the next member to post a public complaint about another member, or just the generic atmosphere, because of religious context, or for any other personal reason for that matter, in a post(s), will be banned, at least if I have my way.
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 10:55 pm
by footsteps
E of Alshire wrote:SavaTheAggie wrote:I swear the next member to post a public complaint about another member, or just the generic atmosphere, because of religious context, or for any other personal reason for that matter, in a post(s), will be banned, at least if I have my way.
Oops, I didn't mean it that way.
The members I identified are definite spammers.
My apologies if I went about it the wrong way this time.
Alan
Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 11:47 pm
by architect
footsteps wrote:E of Alshire wrote:SavaTheAggie wrote:I swear the next member to post a public complaint about another member, or just the generic atmosphere, because of religious context, or for any other personal reason for that matter, in a post(s), will be banned, at least if I have my way.
Oops, I didn't mean it that way.
The members I identified are definite spammers.
My apologies if I went about it the wrong way this time.
Alan
Its ok Alan. We encourage CC members to post spammers names in this section or send us a pm to deal with the problem. Complaining about active non spamming members is entirely different.
E of Alshire: Members jumping to conclusions and trying enforce rules is also against the TOS. Please just let an admin know. Thanks!
Ben
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 12:39 am
by Troy
It is also not necessary to post about them as soon as they sign up. The member list is checked frequently by Anthony and myself to clean these things out. If we miss one, and it's been there for several days, then certainly bring it to our attention.
Thanks,
Troy
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 5:17 pm
by Shurtugal
Sorry for my ignorance, but I honestly don't know. What the heck's a spammer?
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 5:28 pm
by SavaTheAggie
Shurtugal wrote:Sorry for my ignorance, but I honestly don't know. What the heck's a spammer?
'Spam' is an internet term for emails or other types of correspondence, such as forum posts, that are unwanted and/or unsolicited, and usually aimed at selling something.
A 'Spammer' is someone who sends or writes spam.
--Anthony
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 3:53 am
by Jim
Admins: please take a look at new user (carefully) randibanana.
Jim
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 6:37 am
by ragnarok
Here goes another one - No 1003 Nastigallina.
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 1:49 pm
by footsteps
Jared Moynahan #1004 doesn't look so great either.
Large red button on the right.
Alan
Posted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 3:46 pm
by SavaTheAggie
ragnarok wrote:Here goes another one - No 1003 Nastigallina.
footsteps wrote:Jared Moynahan #1004 doesn't look so great either.
Large red button on the right.
Alan
These users have been thoroughly nuked.
Once for being spammers.
And a second time for smoking in the forum.
There will be no smoking in this forum, even if you are a crater.
That is all.
--Anthony
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2006 6:32 pm
by footsteps
Ricky Postlethwaite #1004 should be put on a clydesdale and sent back to Palau.
Better yet, just have a clydesdale step on him. No need to sully Palau's beaches with his... um... er... (okay, right, this is a family friendly site).
Large red button on the right.
Alan
Paraphrase: "Ahh, I love the smell of nuclear fallout in the morning."
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 7:39 am
by ragnarok
I believe user No. 1039 - Zinmiv deserves a closer look. I'm not quite sure it's another spammer, but there's something disturbing in its website and first post.
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:24 am
by Jake, of the Palace Guard
ragnarok wrote:I believe user No. 1039 - Zinmiv deserves a closer look. I'm not quite sure it's another spammer, but there's something disturbing in its website and first post.
I agree, I saw the toolbar as it was loading, but thankfully I got an error
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 7:01 am
by ragnarok
No. 1042 - valentinofera should be vaporized